We advocate for the use of restorative justice mediation, dialogue and conflict transformation in a range of contexts.
We engage in public discourse on matters where restorative justice, conflict transformation and peacebuilding are relevant. We do this using social media, news media, radio and TV.
We engage policy makers and other public officials to advance restorative justice, conflict transformation and peacebuilding. We are alert to opportunities for systemic change and the strengthening of systems.
This advocacy and lobbying is based on the following approach:
The practice of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE can easily become isolated from the context in which crime occurs and attempts to respond justly are made. The connection and progression, from conflict to violence to harm is not always recognised. In our view, Restorative Justice practice in SA at the present time needs to take far more cognisance of these distinctions and progress. The fields of strategic peacebuilding and conflict transformation are valuable tools for doing this.
These terms are the subject of debate in the field of conflict management, conflict resolution and conflict transformation. We identify with the perspective that understands that while certain conflicts can be resolved and managed, they are often symptoms of underlying issues, often situations of serious injustice. Simply managing and resolving conflict can suggest that we ignore these issues and the need for change. Conflict transformation has been suggested as recognising the immediate situation as well as the underlying patterns and context. It has been defined as “to envision and respond to the ebb and flow of social conflict as life-giving opportunities for creating constructive change processes that reduce violence, increase justice in direct interaction and social structures and respond to real-life problems in human relationships.”
Peacebuilding seeks to prevent, reduce, transform, and help people recover from violence in all forms, even structural violence that has not yet led to massive civil unrest. At the same time it empowers people to foster relationships at all levels that sustain them and their environment.
Peacebuilding supports the development of relationships at all levels of society: between individuals and within families; communities; organizations; businesses; governments; and cultural, religious, economic and political institutions and movements. Relationships are a form of power or social capital. When people connect and form relationships, they are more likely to cooperate together to constructively address conflict.
Peace does not just happen. It is built when people take great care in their decision-making to plan for the long term, anticipating potential problems, engaging in ongoing analysis of the conflict and local context, and coordinating different actors and activities in all stages of conflict and at all levels of society. Strategic peacebuilding recognizes the complexity of the tasks required to build peace. Peacebuilding is strategic when resources, actors and approaches are coordinated to accomplish multiple goals and address multiple issues for the long term. Certain values, skills, analyses and processes are inherent in peacebuilding.
We are convinced that the following analysis of conflict is eminently relevant and helpful to us in SA at the present time:
The fact that SA has one of the highest levels of inequality (a major form of structural violence) and some of the highest levels in the world of ALL the forms of self- and community destruction listed is not a coincidence.
We believe that the reality of crime (an expression of secondary violence at community level) needs to be responded to from the perspective of this analysis. Our main focus is at this level, while also touching the levels of self-destruction and national destruction. This analysis also points to the necessity of working in partnerships with a wide range of other stakeholders.
Given the history and current high levels of violence in the country, we are convinced that there is an enormous need to promote tools of non-violent engagement as a way of dealing with concerns and the need for change.
Our history in advocacy
Since 2001, the Restorative Justice Centre has influenced various policies in key areas including:
- The Department of Justice’s manual on community courts;
- The definition of restorative justice in the Child Justice Act, 2008;
- The National Policy Framework on Restorative Justice; and
- 5 superior court judgements dealing with restorative justice, being quoted in the judgement or being a friend of the court.
Despite generally having a very positive policy and jurisprudence environment, the level of actual implementation of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is currently lower than it was 10 years ago.
This situation calls for new levels of collaboration and strategic leadership at all levels by everyone who believes in the value of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE. The RJC is calling for:
- Finalization of the National Policy Framework on Restorative Justice by the Department of Justice
- Development of strategy and implementation plan to ensure systematic implementation supported at the highest levels
- Financial resourcing of the plan